Data brief
Asia in 2026
Midyear 2026 population estimates for 50 country-level entries, alongside 136 language indicators: 129 from CLDR and 7 from named supplementary sources. Language measurement years and definitions differ.
The short answer
Asia in 2026 is not a set of monolingual states. Population is concentrated in two entries — China and India together account for nearly three-fifths of the continent — while most countries here routinely operate in more than one language.
Data brief / Test your intuition
How many people live in Japan?
Published comparison
- India 1,476.6M
- China 1,412.9M
- Indonesia 287.9M
- Pakistan 259.3M
- Bangladesh 177.8M
- Russia 143.4M
- Japan 122.4M
- Philippines 117.7M
2026 midyear estimates, not census enumerations. The 50-entry count is calculated from the published table.
UN World Population Prospects 2024 via Asia in 2026 ↗Open all 50 entries ↗
India and China together account for about 58% of the population across all fifty entries. The full table follows.
Population figures use one UN midyear 2026 projection series. The language cells draw from different measurement periods and definitions. CLDR provides approximate functional-population estimates; supplementary cells include self-rated proficiency, combined speech or literacy ability, and historical language shares. These measures cannot be ranked as equivalent abilities. See the measurement year and definition in each daggered source note.
Where the language figures come from. 129 of the 136 cells come from Unicode CLDR 49, used as a single common layer so that entries are drawn from one place rather than assembled country by country. CLDR's own figures are approximate and rest on underlying sources that vary in age and method, so this is a common layer — not a uniform measurement. The remaining 7, marked †, name their publisher, measurement period, definition and comparability limit in the source popover. Estimates are shown with ≈ or as a bound such as <0.1%, and are rounded. The year 2026 applies to population, not to these language observations.
What was withdrawn. An external source audit on 1 August 2026 found twelve further language cells whose cited source did not establish the figure, or rested on evidence too weak for a brief of this kind. They have been removed rather than restated, and the affected entries — the Koreas, Palestine and four Gulf states — now show only their common-layer figures. On 18 October 2026, two more entries were withdrawn: a Bengali share inferred from Bangladeshi nationality in the Maldives and a Yemen-only Mehri share inferred from a speaker count spanning Yemen and Oman. Neither cited source measured the displayed language percentage. The corrections log records these changes.
East Asia & Russia
| Language use (estimated) | ||
|---|---|---|
| China | 1,412.9M | Chinese/Mandarin ≈90% · Wu Chinese ≈6% · Cantonese ≈5% |
| Russia | 143.4M | Russian ≈99% · English ≈4% · Tatar ≈2% |
| Japan | 122.4M | Japanese ≈95% · English ≈10% Japan — English ≈10% Terasawa, Asian Englishes (online 2023) | data: EASS 2008 and 2018; AsiaBarometer 2003-2008 | measure: nationally sampled self-rating of fair or higher English proficiency | not observed fluency or comparable with CLDR. doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2023.2191410 · Ryukyuan ≈0.8% |
| South Korea | 51.6M | Korean ≈100% · English ≈20% South Korea — English ≈20% Terasawa, Asian Englishes (online 2023) | data: EASS 2008 and 2018; AsiaBarometer 2003-2008 | measure: nationally sampled self-rating of fair or higher English proficiency | not observed fluency or comparable with CLDR. doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2023.2191410 |
| North Korea | 26.6M | Korean ≈88% |
| Taiwan | 23.0M | Mandarin ≈95% · Taiwanese/Hokkien ≈57% · Hakka ≈11% |
| Mongolia | 3.6M | Mongolian ≈93% · Kazakh ≈7% · Chinese ≈1% |
Southeast Asia
| Language use (estimated) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 287.9M | Indonesian ≈64% · Javanese ≈34% · Sundanese ≈12% |
| Philippines | 117.7M | English ≈64% · Filipino ≈60% · Cebuano ≈24% |
| Vietnam | 102.2M | Vietnamese ≈86% · Hmong ≈1.4% · Chinese ≈1.1% |
| Thailand | 71.6M | Thai ≈80% · English ≈27% · Isan ≈24% |
| Myanmar | 55.2M | Burmese ≈64% · Shan ≈6% · Kachin ≈2% |
| Malaysia | 36.4M | Malay ≈75% · English ≈21% · Chinese ≈17% |
| Cambodia | 18.1M | Khmer ≈89% · Western Cham ≈1.6% · Kuy ≈0.1% |
| Laos | 8.0M | Lao ≈69% · Khmu ≈6% · Hmong ≈3% |
| Singapore | 5.9M | English ≈80% · Chinese ≈62% · Malay ≈19% |
| Timor-Leste | 1.4M | Tetum ≈92% Timor-Leste — Tetum ≈92% Timor-Leste GDS/UNICEF/UNFPA, Census 2015, Education Monograph Table 4.1 | age 5+; 100% minus share unable to speak, read or write; includes read-only ability | not a speech-only or regular-use rate; not comparable to CLDR. www.unicef.org/timorleste/media/2211/file/Education%20Monograph… · Indonesian ≈62% Timor-Leste — Indonesian ≈62% Timor-Leste GDS/UNICEF/UNFPA, Census 2015, Education Monograph Table 4.1 | age 5+; 100% minus share unable to speak, read or write; includes read-only ability | not a speech-only or regular-use rate; not comparable to CLDR. www.unicef.org/timorleste/media/2211/file/Education%20Monograph… · Portuguese ≈61% Timor-Leste — Portuguese ≈61% Timor-Leste GDS/UNICEF/UNFPA, Census 2015, Education Monograph Table 4.1 | age 5+; 100% minus share unable to speak, read or write; includes read-only ability | not a speech-only or regular-use rate; not comparable to CLDR. www.unicef.org/timorleste/media/2211/file/Education%20Monograph… |
| Brunei | 0.47M | Malay ≈93% · Chinese ≈11% · English ≈2% |
South Asia
| Language use (estimated) | ||
|---|---|---|
| India | 1,476.6M | Hindi ≈41% · English ≈19% · Bangla ≈8% |
| Pakistan | 259.3M | Urdu ≈95% · Punjabi ≈70% · English ≈50% |
| Bangladesh | 177.8M | Bangla ≈98% · English ≈18% · Rangpuri ≈7% |
| Afghanistan | 45.0M | Persian/Dari ≈50% · Pashto ≈43% · Hazaragi ≈6% |
| Nepal | 29.6M | Nepali ≈44% · Maithili ≈11% · Bhojpuri ≈7% |
| Sri Lanka | 23.3M | Sinhala ≈68% · Tamil ≈15% · English ≈10% |
| Bhutan | 0.80M | Dzongkha ≈47% · Nepali ≈17% · Tshangla ≈15% |
| Maldives | 0.53M | Dhivehi ≈98% · English ≈75% |
Central Asia & Caucasus
| Language use (estimated) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Uzbekistan | 37.7M | Uzbek ≈85% · Russian ≈14% · Karakalpak ≈2% |
| Kazakhstan | 21.1M | Russian ≈72% · Kazakh ≈64% · English ≈15% |
| Tajikistan | 11.0M | Tajik ≈100% · Russian ≈12% · Uzbek ≈12% Tajikistan — Uzbek ≈12% CIA World Factbook (archival republication) | estimate: 2010; 11.9% Uzbek in reported languages | underlying survey instrument and second-language inclusion not specified; not comparable to self-rated proficiency or CLDR. openfactbook.org/countries/tajikistan |
| Azerbaijan | 10.5M | Azeri ≈89% · Talysh ≈10% · Kurdish <1% |
| Turkmenistan | 7.7M | Turkmen ≈70% · Russian ≈12% · Uzbek ≈9% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 7.4M | Kyrgyz ≈48% · Russian ≈36% · Uzbek ≈14% Kyrgyzstan — Uzbek ≈14% CIA World Factbook (archival republication) | estimate: 2009; 14.4% Uzbek in reported languages | underlying survey instrument and second-language inclusion not specified; not comparable to self-rated proficiency or CLDR. openfactbook.org/countries/kyrgyzstan |
| Georgia | 3.8M | Georgian ≈86% · Mingrelian ≈11% · Russian ≈9% |
| Armenia | 2.9M | Armenian ≈99% · Russian ≈65% · Kurdish ≈3% |
West Asia I
| Language use (estimated) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Iran | 93.2M | Persian ≈75% · Azeri ≈24% · Mazanderani ≈5% |
| Turkey | 87.9M | Turkish ≈93% · English ≈17% · Kurdish ≈6% |
| Iraq | 48.0M | Arabic ≈68% · English ≈35% · Kurdish ≈12% |
| Yemen | 43.0M | Arabic ≈74% · English ≈9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 35.2M | Arabic ≈100% |
| Syria | 26.5M | Arabic ≈85% · Kurdish ≈8% · French ≈6% |
| Jordan | 11.6M | Arabic ≈100% · English ≈45% · Adyghe ≈1% |
| Israel | 9.6M | Hebrew ≈100% · English ≈85% · Arabic ≈20% |
| Lebanon | 5.9M | Arabic ≈100% · English ≈40% · French ≈38% |
| Palestine | 5.7M | Arabic ≈100% |
West Asia II & Gulf
| Language use (estimated) | ||
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 11.6M | Arabic ≈78% · English ≈50% · Malayalam ≈7% |
| Oman | 5.7M | Arabic ≈81% · Baluchi ≈5% · Persian ≈1% |
| Kuwait | 5.1M | Arabic ≈100% |
| Qatar | 3.2M | Arabic ≈89% · Persian ≈11% |
| Bahrain | 1.7M | Arabic ≈87% |
| Cyprus | 1.38M | Greek ≈95% · English ≈73% · Turkish ≈23% |
Worked example: the Portuguese cell. The Timor-Leste 2015 census Education Monograph, Table 4.1 records 39.3% of people aged five or older as unable to speak, read or write Portuguese. Subtracting from 100 yields 60.7%, displayed as about 61%. That group includes 24.5% who could read only. It is a measure of any reported language ability, not a Portuguese-speaking rate, and it cannot be directly compared with the English proficiency estimates.
How to read this
- Rows sort by population within each region.
- Regional groupings are editorial. Taiwan and all of Russia are included deliberately.
- Language indicators have different definitions and measurement years. Some describe self-reported ability; others report a language share or any ability to speak, read or write. They are not a common proficiency test or a ranking of mother tongues.
- † marks a cell drawn from a supplementary source rather than the common CLDR layer.
- Figures are rounded for reading, not for calculation.
Download the full table (CSV) 136 rows — one per language cell, each with its country, population and named source.
Funding and competing interests
This brief was produced without external funding, commission or sponsorship. No organisation named in it, and no publisher of any source cited in it, reviewed it before publication or has any relationship with East Asian Journal. It contains no affiliate links. The publication's general position is on the disclosures page.
Sources
- UN DESA, World Population Prospects 2024 — medium variant, midyear 2026 estimates. population.un.org/wpp
- Unicode CLDR 49, territory–language information — the common layer for 129 of 136 language cells. unicode.org/cldr
- Disclosed supplementary sources for the 7 cells marked †, used where CLDR carries no usable entry.
Found an error? Corrections are logged publicly on the corrections page rather than edited silently.
- Reading
- Written variant
- Romanized place name (not a verified pronunciation)
- Literal sense
- In context