East Asian JournalResearch · Data · Context
English

EAST ASIAN JOURNAL / CLASSICS AND EXAMINATIONS

← Full reading path, sources and thinker profiles

Read. Compare. Reason.

북한 대학 선발 관련 공개 자료 (시험지 미확인)

North Korea · Publicly documented DPRK university selection (paper unverified) · 3 original prompts

These are independent, original, evidence-backed practice exercises, not official examination materials or predictions. Read the relevant study units first. Each solution explains the merits and errors of the proposed interpretations, with links to the underlying philosophical scholarship.

FIELD GUIDE / 05  ·  EXAMINATION READING DESK

Exams, ideas and evidence

Read each doctrine and its evidence before tackling the original examination-style passages. The key terms, position drill and full practice below remain accessible without scripts.

Research reviewed: 17 October 2026Access: FreeIndependence: No affiliation with examination authorities

Editorial distinction: Official documents establish named examinations, curriculum frameworks and assessment formats. Scholarly sources establish the philosophical arguments. Inclusion here does not mean an examination board prescribes each thinker or that a particular question will appear. All practice is original, never reproduced from past papers.

This is the complete reading and retrieval desk. The practice sheet follows below, with original passages, answer-by-answer rationales, a printable key and saved mistakes review.

3 original practice questions · 1 reading units

북한 대학 선발 관련 공개 자료 (시험지 미확인)

Publicly documented DPRK university selection (paper unverified)

South Korea’s Ministry of Unification documents DPRK political-ideological curriculum in universities, but the contents of a publicly verifiable philosophy entrance examination could not be established.

Examination authority
공개 확인 가능 자료: 대한민국 통일부 북한정보포털
Relevant subject
정치사상 교육 관련 설명; 대학 입학 시험 문제는 확인되지 않음
School stage
관찰 자료; 실제 시험 준비용으로 사용 불가 / contextual public research
Format reference
Critical-reading practice only; no claimed DPRK entrance-test format

Documented: Contextual reading about Juche and official accounts, contrasted with independent scholarship; not an exam-unit equivalence. Limit: There is no documented, verifiable national university entrance philosophy paper for this roster; these are original critical reading exercises, not exam simulations.

Official examination and curriculum records

A sourced reading path

Studied in sequence, these editorial units cover the positions and contrasts exercised below. Official curricular context is identified separately from additional philosophical scholarship.

  1. 01
    주체사상과 정치사상 교육의 구별

    Juche doctrine and political education

    김일성의 주체 관련 정치사상과 김정일의 체계화, 황장엽의 이론적 관여를 구별해야 한다. 공개 자료로 특정 대학 입학시험 문항은 확인되지 않았다.

    Kim Il Sung’s political doctrines, Kim Jong Il’s systematizing claims and Hwang Jang-yop’s theoretical role must be distinguished. No verifiable admissions paper for them was identified.

    Read profiles Kim Il SungKim Jong IlHwang Jang-yop Open practice →

    Curricular context and historical sources: 대한민국 통일부 북한정보포털 ↗Korea Institute for National Unification ↗The Washington Post (1997) ↗

How these questions were written

All eighty priority-region questions are original, written as new editorial source passages, contextual problems and combinations rather than transcribed examination items. Original-language writing and parallel English glosses are provided. Each question refers to a doctrine explicitly taught in the reading path, and every choice receives its own explanation. The Japanese and Korean sets model multi-step reading and comparison; the mainland and Taiwan sets model material and passage analysis. Format and curriculum evidence from examining bodies is kept separate from philosophical scholarship; doctrinal coverage is curriculum-connected enrichment unless a prescribed text is confirmed. The sixteen supplementary questions for the other four regions remain clearly differentiated; North Korea is critical reading, not a verified entrance-paper simulation. These materials are independently authored, unaffiliated with examination authorities, and do not cover complete syllabi.

Evidence register: Links alongside every lesson distinguish official examination documents from historical and philosophical scholarship. Wrong answers are explained rather than merely flagged. Examination formats and prescribed readings can change; consult the linked authority before an actual assessment. This independent journal is not endorsed by any examination board.

  1. NORTH KOREA · 01 / 3 critical reading of ideology, not a verified admissions-examination format

    주체 관련 정치사상을 읽을 때 이 페이지가 뒷받침하는 구별은 무엇인가?

    Choose an answer
    Read the solution and each choice's reasoning

    Correct answer: A.

    공적 이념 서술과 학술적 평가를 구별해야 한다.

    Profiles: Kim Il Sung ↗Kim Jong Il ↗Hwang Jang-yop ↗

    Sources: Korea Institute for National Unification ↗The Washington Post (1997) ↗

    Study unit: Review the full reading path ↗

  2. NORTH KOREA · 02 / 3 critical reading of ideology, not a verified admissions-examination format

    이 인물들이 등장하는 북한 대학 입학 철학시험의 공개 검증 상태는?

    Choose an answer
    Read the solution and each choice's reasoning

    Correct answer: B.

    통일부 자료는 북한 교육과정을 설명하지만 이 시험의 공개 문항을 제공하지 않는다.

    Profiles: Kim Il Sung ↗Hwang Jang-yop ↗

    Sources: 대한민국 통일부 북한정보포털 ↗

    Study unit: Review the full reading path ↗

  3. NORTH KOREA · 03 / 3 critical reading of ideology, not a verified admissions-examination format

    국가가 제시하는 이념 설명과 역사 연구를 비교할 때 가장 타당한 방법은?

    Choose an answer
    Read the solution and each choice's reasoning

    Correct answer: C.

    공식 이념과 연구자의 평가를 다른 종류의 증거로 제시해야 한다.

    Profiles: Kim Il Sung ↗Hwang Jang-yop ↗Kim Jong Il ↗

    Sources: 대한민국 통일부 북한정보포털 ↗Korea Institute for National Unification ↗

    Study unit: Review the full reading path ↗

Answer key and explanations

North Korea · 북한 대학 선발 관련 공개 자료 (시험지 미확인)

  1. 1. A.
    공적 이념 서술과 학술적 평가를 구별해야 한다.
  2. 2. B.
    통일부 자료는 북한 교육과정을 설명하지만 이 시험의 공개 문항을 제공하지 않는다.
  3. 3. C.
    공식 이념과 연구자의 평가를 다른 종류의 증거로 제시해야 한다.

Reviewed 17 October 2026. Source records and methodology: EAJ comparative field guide. The issuing examination authorities are not affiliated with this editorial work.